Post by account_disabled on Feb 25, 2024 2:45:06 GMT
The the data out by demographics regardless of whether or not all of that data is super compelling. While this can give publishers a large volume of potential angles to choose from the result is often unfocused content lacking a cohesive narrative. georgeandjerry.gif Only include the most insightful interesting data points in your content even if that means tossing aside most of the data youve gathered. One example of this was a survey we did for a home security client where we asked people about stalkerish behaviors theyd committed.
The juiciest survey data like in respondents had created a fake social account Czech Republic Mobile Number List to spy on someone yikes ended up getting buried because we included every data point from the survey some of which wasnt so interesting. Had we trimmed down the content to only the most shocking findings it probably would have performed far better. Furthermore the more data you include the more time it takes for a publisher to wade through it. As one journalist told us after we sent over an epic amount of data Long story short this will take too much time.
Consider this It shouldnt take a publisher more than seconds of looking at your project to grasp the most meaningful data points. If they cant quickly understand that how will their readers . cool doesnt always yield links. If youre going to use data thats already been reported on you better have a new spin or finding to present. Journalists dont want to cover the same stats they have already covered. A great example of this is a project we created about the reasons startups fail. The majority of the data we used came from CB Insights startup post mortems list which had performed really well for them. As of the time Im writing this according to Open Site Explorer it has linking root domains from sites including BBC Business Insider Fortune.
The juiciest survey data like in respondents had created a fake social account Czech Republic Mobile Number List to spy on someone yikes ended up getting buried because we included every data point from the survey some of which wasnt so interesting. Had we trimmed down the content to only the most shocking findings it probably would have performed far better. Furthermore the more data you include the more time it takes for a publisher to wade through it. As one journalist told us after we sent over an epic amount of data Long story short this will take too much time.
Consider this It shouldnt take a publisher more than seconds of looking at your project to grasp the most meaningful data points. If they cant quickly understand that how will their readers . cool doesnt always yield links. If youre going to use data thats already been reported on you better have a new spin or finding to present. Journalists dont want to cover the same stats they have already covered. A great example of this is a project we created about the reasons startups fail. The majority of the data we used came from CB Insights startup post mortems list which had performed really well for them. As of the time Im writing this according to Open Site Explorer it has linking root domains from sites including BBC Business Insider Fortune.